Comments on: SoftLayer + OpenStack Swift = SoftLayer Object Storage http://blog.softlayer.com/2012/softlayer-openstack-swift-softlayer-object-storage/ A Behind the Scenes Look at the Best Hosting Provider in the World Fri, 24 May 2013 11:59:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Mark http://blog.softlayer.com/2012/softlayer-openstack-swift-softlayer-object-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-41634 Mark Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:21:52 +0000 http://blog.softlayer.com/?p=7207#comment-41634 Why not use the CDMI interface code donated by IBM. It standardizes the object access as well as the metadata search... Why not use the CDMI interface code donated by IBM. It standardizes the object access as well as the metadata search…

]]> By: Ramya http://blog.softlayer.com/2012/softlayer-openstack-swift-softlayer-object-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-41249 Ramya Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:06:34 +0000 http://blog.softlayer.com/?p=7207#comment-41249 hi, Im interested to know the pros and cons of the scenario of hadoop using swift as its storage directory for its input as well as output,please do provide you views regarding this .And it was known from many sources that using swift instead of hdfs in the case of hadoop is advantageous.If so please do share your knowledge whether it has been implemented any team. hi,
Im interested to know the pros and cons of the scenario of hadoop using swift as its storage directory for its input as well as output,please do provide you views regarding this .And it was known from many sources that using swift instead of hdfs in the case of hadoop is advantageous.If so please do share your knowledge whether it has been implemented any team.

]]> By: Oracle and OpenStack: A Tale of Two Completely Opposite Strategies | Leomoo.com http://blog.softlayer.com/2012/softlayer-openstack-swift-softlayer-object-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-38326 Oracle and OpenStack: A Tale of Two Completely Opposite Strategies | Leomoo.com Sat, 21 Apr 2012 01:38:16 +0000 http://blog.softlayer.com/?p=7207#comment-38326 [...] And since its third release (Cactus) it has seen multiple implementations at hosters (Internap, SoftLayer,Dreamhost, Sina.com and most recently HP Cloud), scientific institutions (San Diego Supercomputer [...] [...] And since its third release (Cactus) it has seen multiple implementations at hosters (Internap, SoftLayer,Dreamhost, Sina.com and most recently HP Cloud), scientific institutions (San Diego Supercomputer [...]

]]> By: HostBill Team http://blog.softlayer.com/2012/softlayer-openstack-swift-softlayer-object-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-37166 HostBill Team Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:26:13 +0000 http://blog.softlayer.com/?p=7207#comment-37166 Hey Guys! HostBill is also working on cloudstack integration - http://hostbillapp.com/features/apps/cloudstack.html We can make module for softlayer too :) Please PM me Kris Bieszczad, CEO, HostBill Hey Guys!

HostBill is also working on cloudstack integration – http://hostbillapp.com/features/apps/cloudstack.html
We can make module for softlayer too :)

Please PM me

Kris Bieszczad,
CEO, HostBill

]]> By: Matt | IT Support http://blog.softlayer.com/2012/softlayer-openstack-swift-softlayer-object-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-37027 Matt | IT Support Wed, 07 Mar 2012 04:43:33 +0000 http://blog.softlayer.com/?p=7207#comment-37027 Sounds good - there can't be too many production object Swift deployments running yet. Nice work SL. Sounds good – there can’t be too many production object Swift deployments running yet.
Nice work SL.

]]> By: A Person http://blog.softlayer.com/2012/softlayer-openstack-swift-softlayer-object-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-36885 A Person Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:09:59 +0000 http://blog.softlayer.com/?p=7207#comment-36885 This doesn't make SL Object Storage different. Everything is the same other than the network behind it. Please! This doesn’t make SL Object Storage different. Everything is the same other than the network behind it. Please!

]]>