“Game Changers” in technology force a decision: Adapt or die. When repeating rifles gained popularity in the late 1800s, a business of manufacturing muzzle-loading or breech-loading rifles would have needed to find a way to produce a repeating rifle or it would have lost most (if not all) of it’s business to Winchester. If a fresh-faced independent musician is hitting it big on the coffee shop scene in 2012, she probably won’t be selling out arenas any time soon if she refuses to make her music available digitally. Just ask any of the old-timers in the print media industry … “Game Changers” in technology can be disastrous for an established business in an established industry.
That’s pretty intimidating … Even for tech businesses.
Shifts in technology don’t have to be as drastic and obvious as a “printed newspaper v. social news site” comparison for them to be disruptive. Even subtle advances can wind up making or breaking a business. In fact, many of today’s biggest and most successful tech companies are scrambling to adapt to two simple “game changers” that seem terribly significant:
- “The Cloud”
A quick search of the SoftLayer Blog reminds me that Lance first brought up the importance of IPv6 adoption in October 2007:
ARIN has publically announced the need to shift to IPv6 and numerous articles have outlined the D-Day for IPv4 space. Most experts agree, its coming fast and that it will occur sometime in 2010 at the current pace (that’s about two years for those counting). IPv6 brings enough IP space for an infinite number of users along with improved security features and several other operational efficiencies that will make it very popular. The problem lies between getting from IPv4 to IPv6.
When IPv4 exhaustion was just a blip on the horizon, many businesses probably thought, “Oh, I’ll get around to it when I need to. It’s not a problem yet.” When IANA exhausted the IPv4 pool, they probably started picking up the phone and calling providers to ask what plans they had in place. When some of the Internet’s biggest websites completed a trial transition to IPv6 on World IPv6 Day last year, those businesses started feeling the urgency. With today’s World IPv6 Launch, they know something has to be done.
Regardless of how conservative providers get with IPv4 space, the 4,294,967,296 IPv4 addresses in existence will not last much longer. Soon, users will be accessing an IPv6 Internet, and IPv4-only websites will lose their opportunity to reach those users. That’s a “game changer.”
The other “game changer” many tech businesses are struggling with these days is the move toward “the cloud.” There are a two interesting perspectives in this transition: 1) The challenge many businesses face when choosing whether to adopt cloud computing, and 2) The challenges for businesses that find themselves severing as an integral (sometimes unintentional) part of “the cloud.” You’ve probably seen hundreds of blog posts and articles about the first, so I’ll share a little insight on the second.
When you hear all of the hype about cloud computing and cloud storage offering a hardware-agnostic Utopia of scalable, reliable power, it’s easy to forget that the building blocks of a cloud infrastructure will usually come from vendors that provided a traditional hosting resources. When a computing instance is abstracted from a hardware device, it’s opens up huge variations in usage. It’s possible to have dozens of public cloud instances using a single server’s multi-proc, multi-core resources at a given time. If a vendor prices a piece of software on a “per server” basis, how do they define a “server” when their users are in the cloud? It can be argued that a cloud computing instance with a single core of power is a “server,” and on the flip-side, it’s easy to define a “server” as the hardware object on which many cloud instances may run. I don’t know that there’s an easy way to answer that question, but what I do know is that applying “what used to work” to “what’s happening now” isn’t the right answer.
The hardware and software providers in the cloud space who are able to come up with new approaches unencumbered by the urge to continue “the way we’ve always done it” are going to be the ones that thrive when technology “game changers” emerge, and the providers who dig their heels in the dirt or try to put a square peg into a round hole will get the short end of the “adapt or die” stick.
We’ve tried to innovate and take a fresh look at every opportunity that has come our way, and we do our best to build relationships with agile companies that we see following suit.
I guess a better way to position the decision at the beginning of this post would be to add a little tweak: “Innovate, adapt or die.” How you approach technology “game changers” will define your business’s success.